🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.